- 1st
- 08:40 am
What I ask myself about Dennis Hastert
- 1 comment
- 3rd
- 12:49 am
New Scientist jumps the gun again
- 3 comments
02:27 amToo perfect
02:53 amIt's not so difficult to define: for instance, this ain't it
- 2 comments
- 4th
- 09:00 am
Speaking of sources of information...
- 3 comments
- 5th
- 12:53 am
Worldcon fun
01:09 amHugos
09:59 am"Reputation-based economies need bankruptcy laws"
11:31 amTrying to understand Québécois French
- 8 comments
11:00 pmUrsula K. Le Guin, Changing Planes
- 1 comment
- 6th
- 10:52 am
If you like this, then you'll like that
- 3 comments
05:22 pmGenesis comes back
- 4 comments
08:31 pmI write this just to annoy
- 5 commentsbram
- 8th
- 06:56 pm
No chute
- 6 comments
- 9th
- 11:09 pm
Aftersplat
- 2 comments
- 10th
- 07:48 am
Overtime pay
08:17 amUnaccountability
- 3 comments
11:46 pmHistory flow
- 5 comments
- 11th
- 08:50 pm
Looking backward
- 12th
- 01:46 am
"Persistence of vision" and the perception of motion
- 2 comments
10:25 amExplanapalooza
- 8 comments
- 15th
- 10:53 pm
Now this is impressive
- 2 comments
11:33 pmOn the fritz
- 1 comment
- 18th
- 10:23 pm
Some more than others
- 5 comments
11:15 pmNoted with guffaws in place of comment
- 1 comment
- 19th
- 10:24 am
Did you know?
- 6 comments
09:37 pmMore on non-singularities and the pace of change
- 21st
- 11:26 pm
T cells in action
- 24th
- 08:12 pm
A fate worse than being ignored
- 25th
- 01:53 pm
Physics on Wikipedia
07:26 pmpretty toy
- 1 comment
- 26th
- 10:16 am
oldie but goodie
- 6 comments
- 28th
- 09:30 pm
Thirty years of the Standard Model
- 1 comment