Date: 2003-12-09 11:46 pm (UTC)
I don't have much to say to that, since it might well be a true assessment. I might echo [livejournal.com profile] urbeatle's skepticism that enough Southern votes are really available to be gotten by anyone else.

This is not to say that these states are necessarily one-party places forever. There's something of a modest centrist-Democratic resurgence happening in state politics in Virginia, just because of the aftereffects of Jim Gilmore (a Republican governor who was elected more or less entirely on the basis of an unfulfillable pledge to repeal the car tax, and didn't do so hot). I doubt that Virginia is in play in the presidential election, though.

I have a crazy idea that, as Republicans keep running the whole government and spending it into the ground while pandering to the cultural-authoritarian base, eventually libertarian-minded people in the intermountain West are going to find common cause with liberals. But it isn't going to happen any time soon; the idea that the Democrats are the big-government spending party has a tenacious hold on the imagination. Maybe 2012. Nevada and Arizona might be in play sooner than that. I have seen a few extreme Libertarian Party types toying with voting for Dean; his stance on guns might have removed the main deal-breaker.

I am by no means convinced that Dean can actually win, and to say that I like him is something of an exaggeration; I just don't think that his nomination would be that huge a disaster compared to the nomination of somebody else, and I think it might even be the best thing for the longer term.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 06:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »